Changes that come with the New Year are not limited to personal resolutions. Laws also change and/or are enacted that affect all of us. From statutes which mandate equal pay to those that increase minimum wage, the legal landscape in 2016 has undergone changes and...
Month: April 2016
Enforcing Commercial Landlord’s Rights in Bankruptcy
Despite the unambiguous language of Bankruptcy Code Section 365(d), which requires a debtor, debtor-in-possession, or bankruptcy trustee to "timely perform" all obligations under an unexpired non-residential lease, it is somewhat common-place for these lease...
Professionals Employed by Bankruptcy Estate Beware
Professionals seeking to be employed under Bankruptcy Code Section 328, most commonly when seeking to be employed on a contingency fee basis, should be careful to ensure the employment motion and order specifically state the professional is being employed under...
New Notice and Posting Requirements for Employers
Owning and managing a business in California can be very challenging given the pro employee legal climate. In order to avoid liability you must stay on top of new laws effecting your rights as an employer. Effective April 1, 2016, employers are required to comply with...
ESTOPPEL TO THE RESCUE: OBJECTIONS TO EXEMPTIONS ON THE BASIS OF BAD FAITH SURVIVE LAW V. SIEGEL IN CALIFORNIA
In 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Ninth Circuit's imposition of an equitable surcharge on the basis of bad faith against a debtor's exempt property in Law v. Siegel, 134 S.Ct. 1188 (2014). The Supreme Court held that the general equitable powers of...
Limited Liability Company verses Subchapter S Corporation
It is important to know the significant differences between a Limited Liability Company ("LLC") and a Subchapter S Corporation in California ("S-Corp"). This posting addresses a few of those differences.Both an LLC and an S Corp. provide limited liability to their...
“Actual Knowledge” Requirement Addressed By The 9th Circuit BAP in Case Regarding Claim of Violation of the Discharge Injunction
In Emmert v. Taggart (In re Taggart), BAP No. OR-15-1119-JuKiF, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (the "BAP") reversed an Oregon bankruptcy court's decision to sanction an Appellant for willfully violating the discharge injunction because the bankruptcy court...
Application of Automatic Stay to Actions By a Debtor
The automatic stay only applies as to actions against a debtor and not as to actions filed by a debtor. See, In re Merrick, 175 B.R. 333 (9th Cir. BAP 1994); In re Mitchell, 206 B.R. 204, 212 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 1997) ("Section 362 stay does not apply where, as here,...
New Notice and Posting Requirements for Employers
Effective April 1, 2016, employers are required to comply with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing's ("DFEH") new notice and posting requirements regarding Pregnancy Disability Leave. See 2 CCR § 11051. The new regulations require employers...
“Continuous Residency” Requirement Addressed By The 9th Circuit BAP in Case Regarding Claim of Homestead Exemption
In Diaz v. Kosmata (In re Diaz), BAP No. CC-15-1219, the 9th Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (the "BAP") reversed the Central District bankruptcy court's allowance of a homestead exemption for a disabled debtor, holding that the bankruptcy court erred in failing to...