The U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit (“BAP”) recently held in Wu v. Markosian (In re Markosian), BAP No. NC-13-1339-JuKiD (9th Cir. BAP March 12, 2014), that a bonus earned by the debtor by his employer for services performed while the case was pending in Chapter 11 reverted to the debtors upon conversion of the case to Chapter 7 and was not the property of the Chapter 7 bankruptcy estate. Earnings received post-petition in a Chapter 11 case are generally the property of the estate under Section 1115(a)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code but are not the property of the estate in a Chapter 7 case under Section 541(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code. The BAP based its decision on Section 348(f)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code which excludes a debtor’s post-petition earnings from the property of a Chapter 7 estate upon conversion from a Chapter 13 case. The BAP found no difference between the conversion of a Chapter 13 case to a Chapter 7 case versus the conversion of a Chapter 11 case to a Chapter 7 case. However, in Markosian, the case was originally filed as a Chapter 7, converted to Chapter 11, and then converted back to Chapter 7. The BAP, citing to Magallanes v. Williams (In re Magallanes), 96 B.R. 253, 255 (9th Cir. BAP 1988), found that property of the estate is determined as of the filing date of the Chapter 11 petition, not the conversion date. In this case, on the Petition Date, the case was originally filed in a Chapter 7 case, so Section 541(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code excluded post-petition earnings from the estate. Thus, income that came into the Chapter 11 estate is recharacterized as the property of the debtor upon conversion. Query whether the Court would come to the same result if the filing was originally commenced as a Chapter 11 such that on the petition date, post-petition earnings were property of the Chapter 11 estate.
Blog
BAP holds that post-petition earnings earned during Chapter 11 revert to debtors upon conversion to Chapter 7
On behalf of Shulman Bastian Friedman & Bui LLP | Aug 12, 2014 | Bankruptcy Appellate Panel |
Categories
- Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (17)
- Business Litigation (68)
- Chapter 11 (36)
- Contract Disputes (24)
- Employment (9)
- Firm News (2)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (51)
- Potential Claims (1)
- Sales & Dissolutions (15)
Archives
- December 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (4)
- November 2016 (6)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (6)
- April 2016 (10)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (7)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (9)
- November 2015 (10)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (10)
- August 2015 (9)
- July 2015 (10)
- June 2015 (8)
- May 2015 (9)
- April 2015 (11)
- March 2015 (12)
- February 2015 (6)
- January 2015 (12)
- December 2014 (8)
- November 2014 (9)
- October 2014 (10)
- September 2014 (16)
- August 2014 (13)
- July 2014 (10)
- June 2014 (11)
- September 2010 (1)
Recent Posts
- Melissa Davis Lowe Named Director to Federal Bar Association
- The Firm Holds YogaWorks Auction to Nearly Double the Stalking Horse Price
- In re Brace
- The General Rules for Implementing the Alternative Work Schedule Within A Company
- Bankruptcy Courts Still Have Power to Retroactively Annul Stay, Regardless of Recent Supreme Court Ruling in Acevedo