The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued the opinion, Shapiro v. Henson, which held that a party has a statutory duty to turn over property that it had possession, custody or control of at any time during the bankruptcy case. Prior to filing a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, the debtor had written several checks drawn on a Bank of America checking account with $6,955.19 in it, but the bank did not honor those checks until after the debtor filed her bankruptcy petition. The trustee requested turnover of all the money that was in the account as of the date the petition was filed. The debtor responded that she was no longer in possession of the funds and could not comply. The bankruptcy court ruled in favor of the debtor, stating that she did not have possession or control of the funds at the time the trustee filed the motion for turnover. The district court affirmed. However, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision, holding that two key phrases in Section 542 of the Bankruptcy Code supported its ruling: “during the case” and “or the value of such property.” The Ninth Circuit found that the phrase “during the case” evidenced that there is no temporal restriction for turnover of property or the filing of a turnover motion. Since a trustee can recover “the value of such property” instead of the property itself, possession is not a prerequisite for a turnover motion. Accordingly, a trustee may seek turnover against a party regardless of whether or not a debtor is in possession of the property in question when a motion for turnover is filed.
Blog
The Ninth Circuit Holds That the Trustee’s Turnover Power is Not Restricted to Property of the Estate at the Time the Motion for Turnover is Filed
On behalf of Shulman Bastian Friedman & Bui LLP | Jun 23, 2014 | Uncategorized |
Categories
- Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (17)
- Business Litigation (68)
- Chapter 11 (36)
- Contract Disputes (24)
- Employment (9)
- Firm News (2)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (51)
- Potential Claims (1)
- Sales & Dissolutions (15)
Archives
- December 2020 (2)
- July 2020 (3)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (2)
- April 2020 (3)
- December 2019 (2)
- November 2019 (1)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (3)
- August 2019 (2)
- July 2019 (1)
- June 2019 (1)
- May 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (1)
- January 2019 (1)
- September 2018 (1)
- June 2018 (2)
- May 2018 (5)
- April 2018 (6)
- March 2018 (1)
- February 2018 (2)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (1)
- October 2017 (5)
- August 2017 (10)
- July 2017 (1)
- June 2017 (3)
- March 2017 (1)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (4)
- November 2016 (6)
- October 2016 (4)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (2)
- May 2016 (6)
- April 2016 (10)
- March 2016 (7)
- February 2016 (7)
- January 2016 (10)
- December 2015 (9)
- November 2015 (10)
- October 2015 (7)
- September 2015 (10)
- August 2015 (9)
- July 2015 (10)
- June 2015 (8)
- May 2015 (9)
- April 2015 (11)
- March 2015 (12)
- February 2015 (6)
- January 2015 (12)
- December 2014 (8)
- November 2014 (9)
- October 2014 (10)
- September 2014 (16)
- August 2014 (13)
- July 2014 (10)
- June 2014 (11)
- September 2010 (1)
Recent Posts
- Melissa Davis Lowe Named Director to Federal Bar Association
- The Firm Holds YogaWorks Auction to Nearly Double the Stalking Horse Price
- In re Brace
- The General Rules for Implementing the Alternative Work Schedule Within A Company
- Bankruptcy Courts Still Have Power to Retroactively Annul Stay, Regardless of Recent Supreme Court Ruling in Acevedo