The California Supreme Court Prohibits On-Call and On-Duty Rest Periods

On December 22, 2016, the California Supreme Court addressed , in Augustus v. ABM Security Services, Inc., 2016 WL 7407328 (Cal. Dec. 22, 2016), whether California law requires employers to provide employees off-duty rest periods, and whether such requirement permits employers to require that employees remain on-call during rest periods. Specifically, the Augustus Court considered whether defendant employer's requirement that its security guard employees carry radios during rest breaks violated California Law.

The Court held that, Labor Code ยง 226.7 and Wage Order 4-2001 "obligate[] employers to permit - and authorize[] employees to take - off-duty rest periods...during rest periods employers must relieve employees of all duties and relinquish control over how employees spend their time." On-call rest periods were held to be inconsistent with this requirement and therefore prohibited since "one cannot square the practice of compelling employees to remain at the ready, tethered by time and policy to particular locations or communications devices, with the requirement to relieve employees of all work duties and control" during rest periods.

Augustus is a timely reminder for employers to review their meal and rest period policies to ensure compliance with the current state of California law.

If you have any questions about the foregoing, please contact Kiara W. Gebhart at 949-340-3400 or [email protected].

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • NBLSC Board Certified Lawyer Rated By Super Lawyers | Ryan P. Durham Rated By Super Lawyers | Ben Boston
  • Tennessee Association For Justice | Member 2015-2016 American Association For Premier DUI Attorneys The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • American Institute of Family Law Attorneys | 10 best 2015 American Institute of Personal Injury attorneys | 10 best 2016 AV preeminent |  Jeffery Broker

Schedule a Consultation Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Shulman Bastian LLP | Full Service. Business. Lawyers.

100 Spectrum Center Drive
Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92618

Map & Directions

3550 Vine Street
Suite 210
Riverside, CA 92507

Map & Directions