In re Obedian: Central District Bankruptcy Court Applies Valli To Find Property Held in Joint Tenancy is Community Property

In In re Obedian, 546 B.R. 409 (Bankr. C.D. Cal. March 1, 2016), a Central District Bankruptcy Court recently applied the California Supreme Court case, In re Marriage of Valli, 58 Cal. 4th 1396 (Cal. 2014). In Valli, the California Supreme Court found, that in an action between spouses, Cal. Fam. Code § 760 (property acquired by a married person during marriage) controls in purchases from a third party and thus the transmutation requirements apply. Specifically, the California Supreme Court found that while the form of title presumption under Cal. Evid. Code § 662 may sometimes apply, it does not apply when it conflicts with the transmutation statutes. In Obedian, the bankruptcy court held that, as provided in Valli, the form of title presumption does not trump the community property presumption under Section 760 of the Family Code. The Chapter 7 trustee did not rebut the evidentiary presumption under Cal. Fam. Code § 760 by proving by a preponderance of evidence that the property had been "transmuted" pursuant to the requirements of Cal. Fam. Code § 852. Therefore, the Bankruptcy Court determined that a property held in joint tenancy was community property. At Shulman Bastian Friedman & Bui LLP our bankruptcy lawyers have extensive experience in representing Chapter 7 Trustees and Debtors. Please contact us at or call us at 949-340-3400 to speak with one of our lawyers.

To see the full opinion, please click here.

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • NBLSC Board Certified Lawyer Rated By Super Lawyers | Ryan P. Durham Rated By Super Lawyers | Ben Boston
  • Tennessee Association For Justice | Member 2015-2016 American Association For Premier DUI Attorneys The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • American Institute of Family Law Attorneys | 10 best 2015 American Institute of Personal Injury attorneys | 10 best 2016 AV preeminent |  Jeffery Broker

Schedule a Consultation Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Shulman Bastian LLP | Full Service. Business. Lawyers.

100 Spectrum Center Drive
Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92618

Map & Directions

3550 Vine Street
Suite 210
Riverside, CA 92507

Map & Directions