Section 523(a)(1)(C) Claims for Tax Fraud Require Specific Intent

On September 15, 2014, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ("Court") issued the opinion Hawkins v. the Franchise Tax Board of California, et. al., Case No. 11-6276, pursuant to which the Court held that claims for non-dischargeability under Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(1)(C) based on a willful attempt to evade or defeat taxes requires a specific bad intent and not just mere knowledge of the consequences of the act. The Court determined the meaning of "willful" and decided there must be a specific bad intent to evade taxes. The Court's opinion is contrary to previous decisions in the Tenth Circuit where all that is required is mere knowledge of a duty to pay taxes and the voluntary and intentional violation of such duty.

For the full opinion, please click here

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • NBLSC Board Certified Lawyer Rated By Super Lawyers | Ryan P. Durham Rated By Super Lawyers | Ben Boston
  • Tennessee Association For Justice | Member 2015-2016 American Association For Premier DUI Attorneys The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • American Institute of Family Law Attorneys | 10 best 2015 American Institute of Personal Injury attorneys | 10 best 2016

Schedule a Consultation Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Shulman Bastian LLP | Full Service. Business. Lawyers.

100 Spectrum Center Drive
Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92618

Map & Directions

3550 Vine Street
Suite 210
Riverside, CA 92507

Map & Directions