Supreme Court Gives Cell Phones Constitutional Protection

"The Supreme Court of the United States unanimously decided on Wednesday, June 25th, that the contents of your cell phone are worthy of protection under the Fourth Amendment from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. The Court was clear that if the government wants to search your phone, it must first obtain a warrant. In ruling against an Obama administration position, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the Court finding that merely because a person might have a cell phone on them at the time they are detained does not give the authorities the ability to search the contents of the phone. Chief Justice Roberts distinguished cell phones from other devices calling it "not just another technological convenience[.]" Cell phones contain vast amounts of personal information which is no less deserving of Fourth Amendment protection. The Court was very clear in its expectations of law enforcement going forward: "Our answer to the question of what police must do before searching a cell phone seized incident to an arrest is accordingly simple - get a warrant[.]"

The Court's decision related to one David Riley who was stopped in San Diego for driving with an expired license. The search of his vehicle revealed that he was carrying guns for which he was arrested for carrying concealed weapons. The important part of the decision related to the police's subsequent search of Mr. Riley's cellphone from which they discovered incriminating pictures and video's connecting him with purportedly gang-related crimes.

As with most laws, there are exceptions and this case is no different. The Court noted that some searches were appropriate under extreme circumstances without the authorities having first obtained a warrant such as in kidnapping cases or imminent threats such as a bomb. Those circumstances are so severe that a subsequent evaluation by a court would provide sufficient constitutional protection. Otherwise, a warrant is required. Chief Justice Roberts emphasized that warrants are an important constitution requirement and not merely an inconvenience."

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
  • NBLSC Board Certified Lawyer Rated By Super Lawyers | Ryan P. Durham Rated By Super Lawyers | Ben Boston
  • Tennessee Association For Justice | Member 2015-2016 American Association For Premier DUI Attorneys The National Trial Lawyers | Top 100 Trial Lawyers
  • American Institute of Family Law Attorneys | 10 best 2015 American Institute of Personal Injury attorneys | 10 best 2016 AV preeminent |  Jeffery Broker

Schedule a Consultation Today

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Shulman Bastian LLP | Full Service. Business. Lawyers.

100 Spectrum Center Drive
Suite 600
Irvine, CA 92618

Map & Directions

3550 Vine Street
Suite 210
Riverside, CA 92507

Map & Directions